How to Identify Critical Material Attributes (CMAs) of an API in QbD

In QbD, we often focus heavily on formulation and process variables. But a large part of product performance actually depends on the API itself. Understanding which API attributes are truly critical is essential for building a robust formulation, achieving BE, and ensuring long-term stability.

1. Start With QTPP and CQAs – Not With the API

Criticality always begins with the QTPP and CQAs of the drug product. An API attribute becomes a CMA only if its variability can impact a product CQA such as:

  • Dissolution profile
  • Content uniformity
  • Impurities and degradants
  • Assay
  • Physical stability

This top-down thinking is essential for meaningful CMA identification.

2. Create a List of API Attributes

Before filtering, list down all attributes of the API, typically including:

Physical attributes

  • Particle size distribution, particle shape, polymorphic form, crystallinity, density, flow properties, hygroscopicity, specific surface area.

Chemical attributes

  • Assay, impurity profile, residual solvents, salt form, pKa, oxidative sensitivity, moisture interaction.

Biopharmaceutic attributes

  • Solubility across pH, intrinsic dissolution rate, permeability,

Mechanical attributes (for tablets/capsules)

  • Compressibility, plastic deformation.

This list becomes the starting universe of potential CMAs.

3. Connect Each API Attribute to the CQAs (Risk Assessment)

Using FMEA or a fishbone diagram, evaluate how each attribute may impact CQAs. For every attribute, assess:

  • Severity – Can variation affect product quality or patient safety?
  • Occurrence – How likely is this attribute to vary from lot to lot?
  • Detectability – How easily can we identify variation during incoming control?

High-risk attributes become potential CMAs.

Examples:

  • PSD of a BCS Class II API → significant impact on dissolution and BE.
  • Polymorphic form with different solubility → high impact on release.
  • Bulk density variation → usually lower severity.

4. Confirm Potential CMAs Through Experimental Data

QbD requires evidence. Once high-risk attributes are shortlisted, confirm them through:

  • Screening DoE
  • Targeted experiments varying only the API attributes while keeping formulation constant
  • Dissolution, stability, CU, mechanical studies on resulting batches

A material attribute becomes a confirmed CMA only when variation within realistic ranges shows a measurable and meaningful impact on CQAs.

Examples:

  • Fine API PSD improves dissolution but may cause CU issues — confirmed CMA.
  • Changing API bulk density shows no impact on CQAs — not a CMA.

5. Establish Acceptable Ranges and Control Strategy

For each confirmed CMA:

  • Define acceptable limits
  • Integrate into API specifications and supplier CoA requirements.
  • Strengthen incoming controls (e.g., in-house PSD testing, polymorph checks).
  • Link CMA–CQA justification clearly

This ensures regulatory clarity and long-term product robustness.


Read also: API Particle Size Distribution (PSD) Matters in Generic Formulations


Resource Person: Moinuddin Syed. Ph.D, PMP®

Leave a Comment